Stop translating screenshots into Jira tickets.
AnchorMark clusters near-duplicate reports, drafts a severity, and writes a one-paragraph summary the moment a report lands.
Why this hurts today
Triage is the bottleneck. Three reports of the same checkout bug arrive in five minutes; someone has to read them all, dedupe, write a summary engineers can act on, and pick a severity. Multiply by every release week and triage becomes the role nobody wants and nobody can hire for.
What AnchorMark does
AnchorMark embeds every report and clusters duplicates with a configurable threshold. A short Claude prompt drafts a summary, suggests a severity, and proposes a label set you can accept with one keystroke. AI cost is hard-capped per workspace, summaries cite the captured context (not generic advice), and triagers can override every suggestion before anything syncs to your tracker.
Capabilities
What you get when you turn this on.
Duplicate clustering
Severity drafting
First-draft summary
Cost discipline
Configurable thresholds
Keyboard-driven triage
Frequently asked questions
Is my data used to train models?
Can I disable AI features?
What if the AI clusters two reports that aren't actually duplicates?
Will severity suggestions match my team's taxonomy?
How do AI summaries get into my tracker?
Is there a hard cap on AI spend?
Keep exploring
Every report ships with the screenshot, console errors, network failures, browser, OS, and viewport — captured automatically.
Two-way sync with Linear, Jira, GitHub Issues, and Slack. Mentions, status, and resolution stay in lockstep.
A documented OpenAPI surface and webhook events for comments, mentions, status changes, and project events.
Turn vague reports into reproducible tickets with screenshots, console, and network captured automatically.
Run release-readiness review cycles with a shared queue, severity gates, and historical pass/fail by build.
Ship faster with feedback that already has the receipts.
Start a 14-day trial of the Team plan — no credit card required.